Despite Stephen Keshi's recent experimentation with a
4-4-1-1, the 4-3-3 formation still represents the Super Eagles' best
bet at the World Cup, according to this feature.
The 2014 World Cup, the biggest football showpiece on the planet, is not more than 64 days away.
Stephen Keshi,
from taking the job until the international friendly against Italy, had
been playing with a 4-3-3 formation. It was this same formation that
won him the AFCON trophy 13 months ago in South Africa, and which he
employed at the Confederations Cup.
However, due to the loss of form of
Sunday Mba, such an important component of that formation, the coach was
left with no option than to try out few other players in that position
with no one making a strong claim to that 'Third Man’ role. Against
Italy at Craven Cottage, Keshi introduced the old 4-4-1-1 formation in
order to limit the effect of the unavailability of the third man in the
midfield.
In the above formation, the two central
midfielders were both involved in breaking down their opponents attacks
and as well building up the Eagles’ own offensive. Going by the ‘End
justifies the Means’ theory, the pattern did pay off as both the main
striker and the supporting striker in the original No. 8 role scored to
secure a 2-2 draw.
However, the 4-4-1-1 formation itself
has many tactical shortfalls. Not only does it encourage a team to be
reactive, it also creates a wide gap between the midfielders and the
supporting striker upfront. This is because before the central
midfielders can supply the player in the No. 8 role, they not only have
to win the ball from their opponents but must also move forward across
the half-way line, thereby exposing the centre-backs.
For a team with mobile and fast central
midfielders, the 4-4-1-1 might be a good option but considering the
fact that Ogenyi Onazi, who is mobile, has to be paired with John Obi
Mikel, who is not, this is not an approach that sits comfortably with
the players available to the coach.
With Sunday Mba now back in form in the
French Ligue 2, and given the risks of the 4-4-1-1 pattern, now might
be the best time to revert back to the 4-3-3 formation.
Not only does this formation provide
the much needed attacking frame for the team, it also limits any effects
of a lack of mobility that could affect the team's transition from
defence to attack. Given the attacking promise of the three
aforementioned midfielders, the 4-3-3 will afford any of them the
opportunity to spearhead the team’s counter-attacks as soon as the team
regains possession.
Mba’s fine strike against Cote d’Ivoire
in the AFCON quarter-final was a fine example of how this is possible.
Bright Dike’s goal against Catalonia ahead of the tournament is another
glowing example.
Should Nigeria progress beyond the
group stage, they will likely encounter teams who possess great
attacking menace—in these instance, attack might be the best form of
defence. The 4-3-3 allows the Super Eagles to cause problems for the
opposition and hopefully disrupt their offensive ambitions.
This was evident during the Confederations Cup, when Keshi’s 4-3-3 caused problems for Spain; La Roja, typically accustomed to teams who defended against them, appeared taken aback by the Super Eagles’ adventure.
This formation gives the Eagles
defensive balance as well as an attacking balance, and should the
players hit the World Cup in form, Keshi's team should be in a good
position to beat the weaker teams and, at least, give themselves a
fighting chance against stronger opposition.
All in all the formation will create a
greater opportunity to score goals even when under severe attack from
their opponents owing to the possibilities that exist for speedy counter
attacks. With the above formation in place, the Super Eagles fans
should prepare to see their team travel deep into the competition at the
elite footballing showpiece.
No comments :
Post a Comment